麻醉护理一体化模式在麻醉恢复室的应用效果
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

宛慧(1991.12-),女,四川彭山县人,本科,护师,主要从事麻醉科临床护理工作

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R473

基金项目:


Application Effect of Anesthesia Nursing Integration Mode in Anesthesia Recovery Room
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨麻醉恢复室应用麻醉护理一体化模式的效果。方法 选取2020年2月-2022年2月本 院麻醉恢复室的80例患者为研究对象,根据护理方法不同分为对照组和观察组,各40例。对照组给予常 规麻醉后护理模式,观察组给予麻醉护理一体化模式,比较两组生命体征、疼痛程度、心理状态、苏醒 时间、拔管时间、术后并发症发生情况及护理满意度。结果 观察组护理后舒张压、收缩压、心率均优 于对照组(P<0.05);两组自主呼吸时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组呼之握拳时间、 呼之睁眼时间、拔管时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率为5.00%,低于对照组的 25.00%(P<0.05);观察组护理满意度为92.50%,高于对照组的70.00%(P<0.05)。结论 麻醉护理一体 化模式在麻醉恢复室的应用效果确切,护理效果较常规麻醉后护理模式更佳,有利于保持患者生命体征稳 定,减轻疼痛,改善患者的心理状态,同时可有效缩短患者苏醒时间、拔管时间,减少术后并发症的发生 几率,有利于提升护理满意度。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the effect of anesthesia nursing integration mode in anesthesia recovery room. Methods From February 2020 to February 2022, 80 patients in the anesthesia recovery room of our hospital were selected as the research objects. According to different nursing methods, they were divided into control group and observation group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing mode after anesthesia, and the observation group was given anesthesia nursing integration mode. The vital signs, pain degree, psychological state, recovery time, extubation time, postoperative complications and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure and heart rate of the observation group were better than those of the control group (P0.05). The time of fist clenching, eye opening and extubation in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

宛 慧.麻醉护理一体化模式在麻醉恢复室的应用效果[J].医学美学美容,2023,32(4):110-113.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-11
  • 出版日期: