口腔种植牙修复与常规修复应用于治疗牙列缺损的疗效比较
作者:
作者简介:

赵相(1986.9-),女,河北易县人,本科,主治医师,主要从事口腔修复学相关研究

中图分类号:

R783.4


Efficacy Comparison of Dental Implant Repair and Routine Repair in the Treatment of Dentition Defect
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨采取口腔种植牙修复与常规修复治疗牙体缺损的效果。方法 选取我院牙科2022年 1月-12月收治的42例牙列缺损患病者为研究对象,随机分为对照组与观察组,每组21例。对照组采取 常规修复治疗,观察组采取口腔种植牙修复治疗,比较两组临床疗效、语言功能及咀嚼功能、口腔健康 程度及修复满意度。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为100.00%,高于对照组的71.43%(P<0.05);观察组治 疗2个月后语言功能及咀嚼功能评分高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组治疗2个月后口腔健康程度评分为 (46.21±2.45)分,高于对照组的(40.22±3.11)分(P<0.05);观察组修复满意度为95.24%,高于对照 组的66.67%(P<0.05)。结论 采取口腔种植牙修复治疗牙列缺损的临床效果较为理想,能有效改善患者 的咀嚼功能及语言功能,提高其口腔健康水平,且患者满意度较高。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effect of dental implant repair and routine repair in the treatment of dentition defect. Methods A total of 42 patients with dentition defect admitted to our hospital from January to December 2022 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 21 patients in each group. The control group was treated with routine repair, and the observation group was treated with dental implant repair. The clinical efficacy, language function and masticatory efficiency, oral health and repair satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 100.00%, which was higher than 71.43% in the control group (P<0.05). The scores of language function and masticatory efficiency in the observation group were higher than those in the control group after 2 months of treatment (P<0.05). The oral health score of the observation group was (46.21±2.45) scores, which was higher than (40.22±3.11) scores in the control group after 2 months of treatment (P<0.05). The repair satisfaction of the observation group was 95.24%, which was higher than 66.67% of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of dental implant repair in the treatment of dentition defect is more ideal, which can improve the patient's masticatory efficiency and language function, improve their oral health level, and the patient's satisfaction is high.

    参考文献
    [1] 许伟伟,单显峰,管庆华,等.牙列缺损应用口腔种植牙 修复与常规修复治疗的临床效果比较[J].中国实用医 药,2022,17(22):84-86.
    [2] 马峰.口腔种植牙修复牙列缺损的临床分析[J].世界复合 医学,2022,8(9):148-151.
    [3] 黄正萍.对比口腔种植牙修复与常规修复技术治疗牙列 缺损的效果[J].中国社区医师,2021,37(33):32-33.
    [4] 张健.口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中的临 床应用[J].中国社区医师,2021,37(9):73-74.
    [5] 谢桃美,牟宗琴,黎小胜,等.口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙 列缺损治疗中的临床应用[J].吉林医学,2020,41(6):1395- 1396.
    [6] 宋志涛.牙列缺损行口腔种植牙修复与常规修复的效果 对比[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(22):3967-3968.
    [7] 孙明星.种植牙与常规修复治疗牙列缺损的临床对比[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(20):3645-3647.
    [8] 边少峰.常规修复和种植牙修复治疗牙列缺损的临床效 果对比分析[J].四川解剖学杂志,2019,27(1):37-38.
    [9] 吴孝楠.牙列缺损应用口腔种植牙修复与常规修复治疗 的效果分析[J].中国医药指南,2018,16(20):192-193.
    [10] 常忠福,姜丹丹,张志荣,等.口腔种植修复术在牙列缺损 患者中的应用效果及对龈沟液中TNF-α、IL-6水平的影 响[J].上海口腔医学,2020,29(2):217-220.
    [11] 倪俊鑫,王岩松,赖思煜.口腔种植修复和传统修 复治疗在牙列缺损患者中的应用对比[J].吉林医 学,2019,40(2):348-349.
    [12] 师国军.口腔种植牙修复牙列缺损的临床探讨[J].山西 医药杂志,2018,47(5):559-561.
    [13] 张强,翁蓓军,陈霜.种植牙修复牙列缺损220例临床效果 观察[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2018,15(1):85-88.
    [14] 张国明.牙列缺损行口腔种植牙修复与常规修复治疗的 效果比较[J].实用中西医结合临床,2017,17(5):47-48.
    [15] 卢成焱,丁大志,田冠群,等.种植牙修复牙列缺损50例临 床效果观察[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(7):126-128.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

赵 相,张引刚.口腔种植牙修复与常规修复应用于治疗牙列缺损的疗效比较[J].医学美学美容,2023,32(11):5-8.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:14
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-20
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-02