不同手术及护理方法在包皮过长患者中的应用效果
作者:
作者简介:

刘新萍(1990.9-),女,山东威海人,本科,主管护师,主要从事临床护理工作

中图分类号:

R699.8


Application Effect of different operation and nursing methods in patients with redundant prepuce
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨一次性包皮环切缝合器术(DCSD)+综合护理与传统包皮环切术手术方法(简称传 统手术)+常规护理在包皮过长患者中的应用效果。方法 选择我院2020年7月-2022年12月收治的30例包 皮过长患者,以随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组15例。对照组行传统手术+常规护理,观察组行 DCSD手术+综合护理,比较两组手术时间、切口愈合时间、术后换药次数、护理满意度以及换药疼痛程 度。结果 观察组手术时间、切口愈合时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组术后换 药次数少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组护理满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义 (P <0.05);换药疼痛程度比较,观察组0级疼痛率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 包皮 过长患者采取DCSD手术+综合护理,与传统手术+常规护理比较,能缩短手术时间与切口愈合时间,减少术 后换药次数,减轻术后换药期间疼痛程度,术后患者对护理服务满意度更高,具有确切的应用价值。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the application effect of disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD)+comprehensive nursing and traditional circumcision (referred to as traditional surgery)+routine nursing in patients with redundant prepuce. Methods A total of 30 patients with redundant prepuce admitted to our hospital from July 2020 to December 2022 were selected and divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 15 patients in each group. The control group was treated with traditional surgery+routine nursing, and the observation group was treated with DCSD surgery+comprehensive nursing. The operation time, incision healing time, postoperative dressing change times, nursing satisfaction and dressing change pain degree were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time and incision healing time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). The number of postoperative dressing changes in the observation group was less than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Compared with the pain degree of dressing change, the rate of grade 0 pain in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional surgery+routine nursing, DCSD surgery+comprehensive nursing for patients with redundant prepuce can shorten the operation time and incision healing time, reduce the number of postoperative dressing changes, and reduce the degree of pain during postoperative dressing changes. Meanwhile, patients have higher satisfaction with nursing services after surgery, and with specific application value.

    参考文献
    [1] 吴瑞芳,曾韵琦,王艳明,等.一次性包皮环切缝合器术与 传统包皮环切术手术及护理效果比较[J].广州医科大学 学报,2019,47(4):109-110,129.
    [2] 郭玉珠.一次性包皮环切缝合器手术与包皮环扎术、传 统包皮环切术的临床疗效对比研究[J].实用临床护理学 电子杂志,2020,5(36):40,46.
    [3] 洪亚娇.门诊使用一次性包皮环切缝合器行包皮手术的 护理初探[J].中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(24):185-186.
    [4] 刘菲,陈跃东,郑嘉欣,等.包皮环切缝合器治疗小儿 包茎包皮过长的术后并发症分析[J] .中华男科学杂 志,2021,27(1):91-93.
    [5] 钟萍,席翔,李强,等.微信式延续性护理模式在包皮环切吻 合器术中的应用[J].现代临床医学,2019,45(3):203-204,222.
    [6] 秦慧,古天文,宋英,等.复方利多卡因乳膏用于小儿包皮 环切术的麻醉效果观察及护理[J].中国药业,2015(13):85- 86,87.
    [7] 徐生南,古天文,钟淑芬.新型包皮环切缝合器治疗小 儿包茎及包皮过长的临床观察及护理[J].基层医学论 坛,2015(28):3909-3911.
    [8] 姚丽,朱丽.一次性包皮环切缝合器术与传统包皮环切术 手术及护理效果比较分析[J].医学美学美容,2021,30(5):67.
    [9] 马春芳.一次性包皮环切缝合器包皮环切术的综合护理 [J].现代医药卫生,2020,36(4):607-609.
    [10] 邵彩霞,王晓亚,赵华.一次性包皮环切缝合器包皮环切术 的综合护理指导[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(12):248- 248.
    [11] 康照鹏,欧阳海,谭艳,等.一次性包皮环切缝合器手术细 节改进体会[J].中国性科学,2018,27(6):35-38.
    [12] 彭繁荣,盛黎明.美皮康联合自粘性弹力绷带在包皮环切 术后伤口中的应用[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2019,26(2):31-32.
    [13] 徐土珍,朱红卫,吕伯东,等.一次性包皮环切缝合器行包 皮环切术的护理体会[J].中华男科学杂志,2014,20(6):572- 573.
    [14] 张庆鹏,李红安,罗锁麻,等.一次性包皮环切吻合器行包皮 环切术后并发症分析[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2018,40(6):718- 720.
    [15] 黄国华,蓝建华,唐贤富,等.一次性包皮吻合器包皮切除 术及术后护理体会[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2018,38(4):611- 613.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘新萍.不同手术及护理方法在包皮过长患者中的应用效果[J].医学美学美容,2023,32(15):103-106.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:79
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-09-16