口腔种植修复治疗在牙列缺损患者中的应用效果
作者:
作者简介:

吴仁潇(1990.7-),男,浙江杭州人,本科,住院医师,主要从事口腔临床相关研究

中图分类号:

R781.4


Application Effect of Oral Implant Restoration in Patients with Dentition Defect
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [1]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究牙列缺损患者采取口腔种植修复治疗的效果。 方法 选取杭州临安区口腔医院2021年 2月-2022年2月收治的84例牙列缺损患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为参考组和试验组,各42例,参 考组予以固定义齿修复治疗,试验组予以口腔种植修复治疗,比较两组临床疗效、咬合力、口腔功能情况 及满意度。 结果 试验组治疗总有效率为95.24%,高于参考组的73.81%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试 验组治疗后咬合力优于参考组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组语言、固位、咀嚼、美观度、舒适 度评分均优于参考组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组满意度为97.62%,高于参考组的73.81%,差 异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 口腔种植修复治疗应用于牙列缺损患者,可提升患者咬合力,改善患 者牙齿功能情况,提高患者满意度。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the e?ects of oral implant restoration treatment in patients with dentition defects. Methods A total of 84 patients with dentition defect admitted to Hangzhou Lin'an District Stomatological Hospital from February 2021 to February 2022 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into reference group and experimental group by random number table method, with 42 patients in each group. The reference group was treated with fxed partial denture restoration, and the experimental group was treated with oral implant restoration. The clinical efcacy, bite force, oral function and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results The total e?ective rate of treatment in the experimental group was 95.24%, which was higher than 73.81% in the reference group, and the di?erence was statistically signifcant (P<0.05). After treatment, the bite force of the experimental group was better than that of the reference group, and the di?erence was statistically signifcant (P<0.05). The scores of language, retention, chewing, aesthetics and comfort in the experimental group were better than those in the reference group, and the di?erences were statistically signifcant (P<0.05). The satisfaction of the experimental group was 97.62%, which was higher than 73.81% of the reference group, and the di?erence was statistically signifcant (P<0.05). Conclusion Oral implant restoration treatment can improve the bite force of patients with dentition defect, improve their dental function and patient satisfaction.

    参考文献
    [1] 曾晓川.口腔种植修复术在牙列缺损中的治疗效果及对 患者龈沟液中TNF-α、 IL-6水平的影响[J].中国医学创 新,2022,19(33):42-46. [ 2 ] 张 雨 洋 , 李 欢 欢 . 口 腔 种 植 修 复 治 疗 牙 列 缺 损 的 疗 效及对咀嚼功能的影响分析[J].深圳中西医结合杂 志,2022,32(19):113-116. [3] 许伟伟,单显峰,管庆华,等.牙列缺损应用口腔种植牙 修复与常规修复治疗的临床效果比较[J].中国实用医 药,2022,17(22):84-86. [4] Iskandir M,Bedanie G,Ludwig C,et al.CRT-200.06 U t i l i z a t i o n o f E K O S ( U l t r a s o u n d - A c c e l e r a t e d Thrombolysis) in the Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia[J]. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions,2020,13(4):S31. [5] 赵新宇,白娟,陈建春.牙周整复术联合口腔种植修复术治 疗牙列缺损的效果及对牙周指数的影响[J].中国实用医 刊,2022,49(7):58-61. [6] 徐驰,王进,王清芝.口腔种植牙修复与常规修复治疗牙列 缺损的效果比较[J].中国实用医刊,2022,49(4):53-56. [7] Shchepkina EA,Solomin NL,Korchagin KL,et al.Bone transport over the nail vs Ilizarov method in the treatment of posttraumatic defects of the femur and tibia[J].MedicoBiological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations,2021(2):80-88. [8] 潘彩霞.口腔种植修复对牙列缺损患者的治疗效果分析 [J].实用中西医结合临床,2021,21(23):107-108. [9] 黄正萍.对比口腔种植牙修复与常规修复技术治疗牙列 缺损的效果[J].中国社区医师,2021,37(33):32-33. [10] 童德林,史钰.口腔种植修复在治疗牙列缺损中的临 床应用效果分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2021,32(22):3538- 3539,3545. [11] 梁长征,陈朝兴,黎卓,等.口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙 列缺损治疗中的有效性分析[J].广州医药,2021,52(6):72- 75. [12] 李佳亿,曾婷雯.口腔种植修复治疗牙列缺损的效果分 析[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2021,31(19):125-127. [13] 张兵华,宋涛.口腔种植修复治疗牙列缺损伴牙周炎对牙周 指数及种植体存留的影响[J].中国实用医药,2022,17(14):60- 62. [14] 方腾飞.天然牙联合种植体治疗牙列缺损的临床修复效果 及影响因素分析[J].实用中西医结合临床,2022,22(12):107- 110. [15] 郭敏,时丽丽,刘林.种植体材料的选择对牙列缺损患 者修复效果及牙周健康状况的影响[J].中国美容医 学,2023,32(7):139-142.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

吴仁潇.口腔种植修复治疗在牙列缺损患者中的应用效果[J].医学美学美容,2023,32(18):7-10.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:15
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-24