不同正畸牵引方式在埋伏倒置阻生上颌中切牙患者中的应用效果比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张月东(1987.9-),男,河北黄骅人,本科,主治医师,主要从事口腔正畸科方面研究

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R783.4

基金项目:


Comparison of the Application Effects of Different Orthodontic Traction Methods in Patients with Impacted Maxillary Central Incisors
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    观察对埋伏倒置阻生上颌中切牙患者采用不同正畸牵引方式的矫治效果。方法 选取我 院2020年1月-2022年8月收治的68例埋伏倒置阻生上颌中切牙患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察 组,每组34例。对照组采用前方牵引器牵引治疗,观察组采用颌间牵引治疗,比较两组临床疗效、牵引 时间及埋伏牙牙根长度。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为97.06%,高于对照组的79.41%,差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05);观察组牵引时间为(7.28±2.14)个月,短于对照组的(12.32±3.26)个月,差异有统计学意 义(P <0.05);观察组治疗后埋伏牙牙根长度优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 颌间牵 引在埋伏倒置阻生上颌中切牙患者中的应用效果优于前方牵引器牵引,可提高正畸治疗效果,缩短牵引时 间,还有助于提升患者埋伏牙牙根长度。

    Abstract:

    To observe the effect of different orthodontic traction methods on patients with impacted maxillary central incisors. Methods A total of 68 patients with impacted maxillary central incisors in our hospital from January 2020 to August 2022 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 34 patients in each group. The control group was treated with anterior traction, and the observation group was treated with intermaxillary traction. The clinical efficacy, traction time and root length of impacted teeth were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 97.06%, which was higher than 79.41% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The traction time of the observation group was (7.28±2.14) months, which was shorter than (12.32±3.26) months of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). After treatment, the root length of impacted teeth in the observation group was better than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The application effect of intermaxillary traction in patients with impacted maxillary central incisors is better than that of anterior traction, which can improve the effect of orthodontic treatment, shorten the traction time, and help to improve the length of the root of the impacted teeth.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张月东.不同正畸牵引方式在埋伏倒置阻生上颌中切牙患者中的应用效果比较[J].医学美学美容,2023,32(20):28-31.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-30
  • 出版日期: