即刻种植和早期种植对前牙美学区种植体周围软组织的影响
作者:
作者简介:

张永富(1990.1-),男,山东平邑县人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事口腔医学临床相关工作

中图分类号:

R783.3


Effect of Immediate and Early Implant on the Soft Tissue Around the Implant in the Anterior Aesthetic Area
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [16]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    分析即刻种植与早期种植对前牙美学区种植体周围软组织的影响。方法 选取平邑县中医 医院2021年6月-2022年6月收治的28例单颗前牙缺失患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为参考组及试 验组,每组14例。其中参考组采取早期种植,试验组采取即刻种植,比较两组软组织美学效果、骨吸收 水平、修复满意度。结果 两组种植成功率比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);试验组治疗1、3、 6、12个月PES评分高于参考组(P <0.05);两组治疗1、3、12个月骨吸收水平比较,差异无统计学意 义(P>0.05);试验组治疗6个月骨吸收水平低于参考组(P<0.05);试验组修复满意度为100.00%,高于 参考组的57.14%(P <0.05)。结论 相较于早期种植,即刻种植在改善前牙美学区种植体周围软组织的美 学效果方面具有良好优势,该种植方法具有较高的种植成功率及安全性,能够有效降低种植后早期骨吸收 水平,患者对其修复效果表示非常满意。

    Abstract:

    To analyze the effects of immediate and early implant on the soft tissue around the implant in the anterior teeth aesthetic area. Methods A total of 28 patients with single anterior tooth loss admitted to Pingyi County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2021 to June 2022 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into reference group and experimental group, with 14 patients in each group. The reference group was treated with early implant, and the experimental group was treated with immediate implant. The soft tissue aesthetic effect, bone resorption level and repair satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the success rate of implantation between the two groups (P >0.05). The PES scores of the experimental group at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment were higher than those of the reference group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in bone resorption level between the two groups at 1, 3 and 12 months after treatment (P >0.05), but the level of bone resorption in the experimental group was lower than that in the reference group after 6 months of treatment (P <0.05). The repair satisfaction of the experimental group was 100.00%, which was higher than 57.14% of the reference group (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with early implant, immediate implant has a good advantage in improving the aesthetic effect of soft tissue around the implant in the anterior teeth aesthetic area. This implantation method has a high success rate and safety, and can effectively reduce the level of early bone resorption after implantation, meanwhile patients are very satisfied with its repair effect.

    参考文献
    [1] 刘秀娟,丁继芬.上颌单颗前牙延期种植即刻种植及 早期种植的回顾性研究[J].山东医学高等专科学校学 报,2021,43(6):401-403.
    [2] 孙亮,杨苗苗,赵佳明,等.上前牙区即刻种植与早期种植 术后软硬组织变化的短期临床观察[J].中华口腔医学杂 志,2020,55(11):857-863.
    [3] 张敏,张晓洁,郑苍尚.前牙不同种植术对美学区种植体周 围软组织影响研究[J].江西医药,2020,55(4):458-460.
    [4] 江希松,张旭,李龙,等.即刻种植和早期种植对前牙美学 区种植体周围软组织的影响分析[J].中国口腔种植学杂 志,2020,25(1):1-3,12.
    [5] 朱艳艳,郭威,刘红霞.即刻种植与早期种植对上颌前牙 缺失患者软组织美学效果的影响比较[J].中国医疗美 容,2020,10(3):68-71.
    [6] 刘峰,余涛.美学区种植过渡修复体对种植体周围软组织 的调控[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2022,23(4):241-247.
    [7] 裴晓庆,王男,李志刚.上颌前牙区即刻种植术后患者牙 槽骨丰隆度与牙龈形态恢复的情况分析[J].中国美容医 学,2019,28(12):129-132.
    [8] 丁姗姗.即刻种植与早期种植对前牙种植体周边软组织美 学效果比较分析[J].中国美容医学,2019,28(12):132-135.
    [9] 李玉旺,郝杰,李红燕.种植体即刻种植与早期种植对 前牙美学区种植体周软组织的影响[ J ] .中国实用医 刊,2019,46(8):86-88.
    [10] 张野.即刻种植和早期种植对前牙美学区种植体周边软 组织的影响分析[J].中国美容医学,2018,27(9):110-113.
    [11] 路晓淼,田瑞雪,张凯.牙支持式外科导板在前牙美学区 种植的临床应用[J].中华全科医学,2022,20(3):384-387.
    [12] 刘亚娟,马庆云,马瑞朝,等.二甲胺四环素联合茶多酚对 早期种植体周围软组织炎患者牙周指标、炎性因子以 及龈沟液RANKL、Shh水平的影响[J].现代生物医学进 展,2021,21(23):4505-4508,4577.
    [13] 王新,袁鼎翔,吴丹,等.前牙美学区即刻种植永久基台 即刻修复后唇侧骨三维变化的定量分析[J].北京口腔医 学,2021,29(4):232-237.
    [14] 曹伟玉,曹捷,刘宾益,等.2种不同种植体植入对种植体 周围软组织的影响[J].上海口腔医学,2022,31(3):305-308.
    [15] 吴洁,鲍利红,陶庭亮.一次性置入永久基台对美学 区种植周围组织影响的应用研究[J].临床口腔医学杂 志,2022,38(7):419-422.
    [16] 张停停,胡晓菁,林璐.种植体植入15年内种植体周围炎和 种植周黏膜炎发生率调查[J].上海口腔医学,2021,30(3):292- 296.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张永富.即刻种植和早期种植对前牙美学区种植体周围软组织的影响[J].医学美学美容,2023,32(23):12-15.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:69
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-27