锤凿劈冠法与微创拔牙治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的临床效果及安全性
作者:
作者简介:

刘庆超(1986.10-),男,江苏兴化人,本科,主治医师,主要从事口腔医学相关研究

中图分类号:

R783.6


Clinical Effect and Safety of Hammer Chisel Split Crown Method and Minimally Invasive Tooth Extraction in the Treatment of Horizontally Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [10]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    分析锤凿劈冠法与微创拔牙治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的有效性及安全性。方法 选取我院2022 年2月-2023年9月收治的80例下颌低位阻生智齿患者,随机分为对照组与研究组,每组40例。对照组应用 锤凿劈冠法治疗,研究组给予微创拔牙治疗,比较两组临床指标、炎症指标、疼痛度和并发症发生率。 结果 研究组手术时长短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组(P <0.05);研究组治疗后抗PgIgG、IL-6、 TNF-α水平均低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组术后1、3、5 d VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组 并发症发生率为2.50%,低于对照组的15.00%(P <0.05)。结论 微创拔牙治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的临床效 果确切,有利于缩短手术用时,减少术中出血量,改善炎症因子水平,疼痛度轻且并发症少。

    Abstract:

    To analyze the clinical effect and safety of hammer chisel split crown method and minimally invasive tooth extraction in the treatment of horizontally impacted mandibular wisdom teeth. Methods From February 2022 to September 2023, 80 patients with horizontally impacted mandibular wisdom teeth admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into control group and study group, with 40 patients in each group. The control group was treated with hammer chisel split crown method, and the study group was treated with minimally invasive tooth extraction. The clinical indexes, inflammation indexes, pain degree and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time of the study group was shorter than that of the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of anti-PgIgG, IL-6 and TNF-α in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The VAS scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group on the 1st, 3rd and 5th day after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group was 2.50%, which was lower than 15.00% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive tooth extraction has a definite clinical effect in the treatment of horizontally impacted mandibular wisdom teeth, which is beneficial to shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss, improve the level of inflammatory factors, reduce the degree of pain and have fewer complications.

    参考文献
    [1] 姜辉,修力军,朱光来.微创拔牙与传统拔牙方法对阻生智 齿拔除的疗效比较[J].川北医学院学报,2022,37(5):575- 577,592.
    [2] 杨东升,温惠媛.微创拔牙术治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的效 果观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2022,16(14):79-81.
    [3] 张福.锤凿劈冠法、高速涡轮钻微创法在下颌低位阻生智 齿治疗中的效果对比[J].中外医学研究,2020,18(7):28-30.
    [4] 贾朝清,王惠敏.微创拔牙法在低位阻生智齿拔除术中的 应用效果分析[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2021,35(2):102-104.
    [5] 曹媛媛.微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J].皖 南医学院学报,2022,41(4):376-378.
    [6] 李阿峰,董建伟,陈萌,等.微创拔牙术对下颌低位阻生智 齿的疗效及血清抗PgIgG TNF-α IL-6的影响[J].西部医 学,2019,31(8):1256-1259,1268.
    [7] 刘长春,张丹.锤凿劈冠法与微创拔牙治疗下颌低位阻生智 齿的临床效果及安全性对比[J].系统医学,2019,4(20):128- 130.
    [8] 曹书信.锤凿劈冠法与微创拔牙在下颌低位阻生智齿拔除 中的应用效果比较[J].临床医学,2021,41(1):77-78.
    [9] 邓志武.微创拔牙术治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的疗效观察 [J].实用临床医药杂志,2020,24(22):90-92.
    [10] 朱向宇,范新昊,刘钟月.超声骨刀机结合高速涡轮手机治疗 下颌复杂阻生智齿效果[J].现代科学仪器,2023,40(1):87-90.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘庆超.锤凿劈冠法与微创拔牙治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的临床效果及安全性[J].医学美学美容,2023,32(24):93-95.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:14
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-15