中西医结合治疗烧伤脓毒症的临床效果
作者:
作者简介:

尹瑶瑶(1976.9-),女,山东青岛人,本科,主治医师,主要从事烧伤科方面研究

通讯作者:

杜宪(1985.11-),女,山东青岛人,本科,主治医师,主要从事烧伤科方面研究

中图分类号:

R631


Clinical Effect of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine in the Treatment of Burn Sepsis
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [7]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    分析中西医结合治疗烧伤脓毒症的临床效果。方法 选取2022年1月-2023年10月青岛君良 烧伤医院烧伤科收治的100例烧伤脓毒症患者为研究对象,随机分成对照组和试验组,各50例。对照组采 用西医治疗,试验组采用中西医结合治疗,比较两组炎症因子水平、临床疗效、康复指标与不良反应发生 率。结果 试验组治疗后LPS、CRP、TNF-α、IL-6水平均低于对照组(P<0.05);试验组治疗总有效率 为96.00%,高于对照组的82.00%(P<0.05);试验组机械通气及住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);两组 不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论 中西医结合疗法在烧伤脓毒症患者中的效果 良好,能够降低炎症因子水平,缩短患者康复进程,且不会增加不良反应发生几率。

    Abstract:

    To analyze the clinical effect of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of burn sepsis. Methods A total of 100 patients with burn sepsis admitted to the Burn Department of Qingdao Junliang Burn Hospital from January 2022 to October 2023 were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 50 patients in each group. The control group was treated with western medicine, and the experimental group was treated with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine. The levels of inflammatory factors, total effective rate of treatment, rehabilitation indicators and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the levels of LPS, CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). The total effective rate of treatment in the experimental group was 96.00%, which was higher than 82.00% in the control group (P <0.05). The mechanical ventilation and hospitalization time of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P >0.05). Conclusion The effect of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine therapy in patients with burn sepsis is good, which can reduce the level of inflammatory factors, shorten the rehabilitation process of patients, and will not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.

    参考文献
    [1]Ladhani HA,Yowler CJ,Claridge JA.Burn Wound Colonization, Infection, and Sepsis[J].Surg Infect (Larchmt),2021,22(1):44-48.
    [2]王晓艳.连续性肾脏替代治疗联合乌司他丁治疗烧伤脓 毒症的疗效观察[J].现代诊断与治疗,2020,31(8):1219- 1220.
    [3]郭海雷.烧伤感染后脓毒症发病率和IL--1β对实验脓毒症 的保护作用及机制研究[D].济南:山东大学,2022.
    [4]董毅,马秀峰,曹建红,等.重度烧伤合并脓毒症相关性脑病 患者血清IL-6与TNF-α的表达水平及临床意义[J].中国 烧伤创疡杂志,2020,32(1):26-28.
    [5]郑兰芝,丁黎敏,徐文婷,等.基于升降散加减的清透解毒方 对脓毒症毒热证患者临床疗效的影响[J].中国中西医结 合急救杂志,2022,29(1):22-26.
    [6]林敏青.脓毒症中医证型分布特点及与相关因素的临床 研究[D].武汉:湖北中医药大学,2021.
    [7]赵青毅.成人重度烧伤患者脓毒症并发情况及其影响因 素分析[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(4):628-630. [ 8 ]李晓亮,李琰光,叶向阳,等.医用臭氧治疗烧伤脓毒 症相关性脑病的临床研究[J].中国实用神经疾病杂 志,2021,24(6):528-535. [9]郑玉红,李华强,王付勇,等.重度烧伤后并发脓毒症的危险 因素[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2020,30(23):3526-3529. [10]王亚菲,赵永健,孙健.重度烧伤患者脓毒症发生的影响 因素及预后分析[J].山东医药,2019,59(34):63-65. [11]姚咏明,张卉,童亚林.深化对烧伤脓毒症诊断体系与治 疗策略的认识[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(5):404-409. [12]彭德明.血必净联合乌司他丁治疗烧伤脓毒症临床疗效 的系统评价[J].天津中医药,2019,36(3):258-263. [13]潘胜平,董逸翔.乌司他丁联合醒脑静注射液治疗脓毒症 的临床效果观察[J].重庆医学,2020,49(4):591-594. [14]雄婉玲,党连强,卢珊.血必净注射液对重度烧伤患者发 生脓毒症的预防作用及对炎性因子的影响[J].中国美容 医学,2020,29(10):81-85. [15]严伟恒,靳媛媛,王宽,等.烧伤早期伴发脓毒症患者血清 PCT、hs-CRP、COR及WBC的动态变化及临床意义[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2020,20(4):760-763,697.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

尹瑶瑶,杜宪,杨廷.中西医结合治疗烧伤脓毒症的临床效果[J].医学美学美容,2024,33(2):124-127.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:17
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-26