半导体激光和强脉冲光脱毛的临床疗效
作者:
作者简介:

张梅(1985.4-),女,江苏苏州人,本科,主要从事皮肤科疾病诊治方面工作

中图分类号:

R758.71


Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Semiconductor Laser and Intensive Pulsed Light for Depilation
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [2]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 观察并比较半导体激光和强脉冲光脱毛的临床疗效。方法 选取2022年1月-2023年1月于本 院进行脱毛的86例患者为研究对象,按照治疗方式不同分为对照组与观察组,每组43例。对照组应用强 脉冲光治疗,观察组应用半导体激光治疗,比较两组临床疗效、疼痛程度、不良反应发生情况及满意 度。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为97.67%,高于对照组的83.72%,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察 组第1、2、3次治疗时VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较, 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 与强脉 冲光脱毛相比,半导体激光脱毛的疗效更好,可减轻患者痛感,提高患者满意度,且不会增加不良反应发 生几率,值得临床应用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe and compare the clinical efficacy of semiconductor laser and intensive pulsed light for depilation. Methods A total of 86 patients who underwent depilation in our hospital from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected as the research objects. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into control group and observation group, with 43 patients in each group. The control group was treated with intensive pulsed light, and the observation group was treated with semiconductor laser. The clinical efficacy, pain degree, adverse reactions and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 97.67%, which was higher than 83.72% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The VAS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group at the first, second and third treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P >0.05). The satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with intensive pulsed light for depilation, semiconductor laser for depilation has better curative effect, which can reduce the pain of patients, improve patient satisfaction, and will not increase the incidence of adverse reactions. It is worthy of clinical application.

    参考文献
    [1]贾丽丽,李晓红,刘效远,等.650 nm强脉冲光脱毛的疗效及 安全性观察[J].中国实用医药,2018,13(8):19-21.
    [2]丁维进,田美英,张慧,等.650~950 nm强脉冲光脱毛1038例 临床疗效观察[J].中国医疗美容,2018,8(6):58-61. [ 3 ]梁军艳,吴翔磊,商颖,等.低温冲击治疗减轻激光脱 毛患者术中疼痛的临床研究[ J ] . 中国激光医学杂 志,2020,29(2):97-101. [4]林佳音,袁定芬.激光及强光脱毛疗效相关因素探讨[J].临 床皮肤科杂志,2016,45(7):545-549. [5]黄显,柴宝.激光在毛发性疾病中的应用[J].皮肤科学通 报,2023,40(4):474-480. [6]魏振东,林茂,涂彩霞.激光脱毛的临床应用[J].实用皮肤 病学杂志,2013,6(5):281-284. [7]马力,王韵晴,刘立科,等.家用光脱毛仪法规和标准现状分 析[J].中国医疗器械杂志,2021,45(5):559-562. [8]赵旬,李邻峰,赵振民,等.半导体810 nm激光脱毛的能量与 疗效分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2020,19(1):108-111. [9]喻丽婷,马小玲,吉玺.A型肉毒毒素注射联合810 nm半导 体激光脱毛治疗局部多汗症及腋臭的临床研究[J].现代 医学与健康研究电子杂志,2018,2(20):40,42. [10]刘莹,张玲,胡守舵,等.强脉冲光脱毛术在外耳重建中的 应用[J].中国美容整形外科杂志,2024,35(2):107-110,127. [11]郑红洁,董继英,姚敏.医学美容激光治疗的发展现状[J]. 皮肤科学通报,2023,40(6):711-718. [12]杨蓉娅,夏志宽,蔡宏.激光脱毛临床应用专家共识[J].实 用皮肤病学杂志,2023,16(1):1-5. [13]王俊玲,张楚怡,王崴,等.1064 nm Nd:YAG激光在 皮肤脱毛中的安全性和有效性分析[J].中国医疗美 容,2022,12(3):45-49. [14]李艳,张晓,殷雨天,等.Light Sheer半导体激光对Becker痣 脱毛疗效的分析[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2022,36(1):54- 59. [15]陈洁,陈婷婷.半导体激光的能量密度对脱毛治疗有效 性、安全性影响的研究[J].皖西学院学报,2021,37(5):59-62. [16]刘淼箐,李慧琼,崔诗悦.800 nm半导体激光脱腋毛的临 床疗效和安全性分析[J].中国医疗美容,2016,6(10):35- 38. [17]刘刚,王芳,严蕾,等.800 nm半导体激光真空脱毛系统 的临床疗效观察[J].中国激光医学杂志,2013,22(6):329- 332,356. [18]李永红,黄一锦,李钟诛,等.800 nm半导体激光脱毛的疗 效与安全性[J].中国激光医学杂志,2012,21(1):38-40.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张梅.半导体激光和强脉冲光脱毛的临床疗效[J].医学美学美容,2024,33(18):39-42.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:16
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-10-22