Objective To explore the effect of minimally invasive extraction and immediate implantation in anterior teeth restoration and its effect on implant stability. Methods From January 2021 to December 2022, 40 patients with minimally invasive tooth extraction admitted to Yuna Yula Dental Clinic of Nanguan District were randomly divided into control group (n =20) and observation group (n =20). The control group was given delayed implantation of minimally invasive extraction, and the observation group was given immediate implantation of minimally invasive extraction. The stability, aesthetic effect and satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results After 3 and 6 months of planting, the planting stability of the observation group was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The WES and PES scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). The satisfaction rate of the observation group was 95.00%, which was higher than 75.00% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The application effect of minimally invasive extraction and immediate implantation in anterior teeth restoration is better than that of minimally invasive extraction and delayed implantation. The stability of implantation after repair is better, which can improve the aesthetic effect and patient satisfaction.