PDCA循环护理模式在行显微骨科游离植皮术患者中的应用效果
作者:
作者简介:

崔莹(1994.12-),女,河南沈丘县人,本科,护师,主要从事骨科护理相关工作

中图分类号:

R473


Application Effect of PDCA Cycle Nursing Mode in Patients Undergoing Micro Orthopedic Free Skin Grafting
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [7]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析对接受显微骨科游离植皮术的患者应用PDCA循环护理模式干预的效果。方法 选取 本院2023年1月-2024年3月收治的64例接受显微骨科游离植皮术患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分 为对照组与观察组,每组32例。对照组予以常规护理干预,观察组予以PDCA循环护理模式干预,比较 两组植皮成功率、生活质量、自我管理、并发症发生情况以及护理满意度。结果 观察组植皮成功率为 93.75%,高于对照组的71.88%(P <0.05);观察组护理后社会功能、角色功能及情绪功能评分高于对照 组(P <0.05);观察组护理后症状管理、日常生活管理、疾病知识管理评分高于对照组(P <0.05); 观察组并发症发生率为12.50%,低于对照组的37.50%(P <0.05);观察组护理满意度高于对照组 (P <0.05)。结论 PDCA循环护理模式为接受显微骨科游离植皮术的患者护理干预提供了新方向,与传 统护理模式相比,该护理方法可以提升植皮成功率,促进患者养成自我管理能力,提升患者生活质量以及 满意度,降低并发症发生几率。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the effect of PDCA cycle nursing mode intervention on patients undergoing micro orthopedic free skin grafting. Methods A total of 64 patients who underwent micro orthopedic free skin grafting in our hospital from January 2023 to March 2024 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 32 patients in each group. The control group was given routine nursing intervention, and the observation group was given PDCA cycle nursing model intervention. The success rate of skin grafting, quality of life, self-management, complications and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The success rate of skin grafting in the observation group was 93.75%, which was higher than 71.88% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The scores of social function, role function and emotional function in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P <0.05). The scores of symptom management, daily life management and disease knowledge management in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 12.50%, which was lower than 37.50% in the control group (P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion PDCA cycle nursing mode provides a new direction for nursing intervention of patients undergoing micro orthopedic free skin grafting. Compared with traditional nursing mode, this nursing method can improve the success rate of skin grafting, promote patients to develop self-management ability, improve patients' quality of life and satisfaction, and reduce the incidence of complications.

    参考文献
    [1]杨爱玲,高瑞玲,郑嫚,等.CICARE沟通模式在负压封闭引 流技术联合游离植皮术修复深度烧伤创面中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2024,30(10):105-108.
    [2]甘小红.光子治疗仪联合全面护理对手臂部烧伤整形植皮 术患者瘢痕愈合质量的影响[J].医疗装备,2024,37(5):158- 160,164.
    [3]林雯娟,刘舒婷.精细化美容护理对烧伤患者整形植皮术 后创面的影响[J].福建医药杂志,2024,46(1):152-155.
    [4]曹梦溪,胡莉红.烧伤患者植皮术后创面愈合质量的影响 因素及相关护理措施[J].医疗装备,2023,36(24):155-158.
    [5]任晓倩.游离植皮术后负压封闭引流术的临床应用及护 理策略探讨[J].医院管理论坛,2021,38(5):60-61,16.
    [6]陈盟盟.疼痛护理管理在VSD联合自体游离皮片植皮 治疗糖尿病足感染创面中的应用[J].承德医学院学 报,2022,39(2):139-142.
    [7]张朦,韩涛,卞兰峥.VAC结合游离植皮治疗儿童大面积皮 肤缺损疗效观察及对患儿生活质量的影响[J].中国美容 医学,2020,29(5):93-96. [ 8 ]杨文元.负压封闭引流治疗深度烧伤创面及对血清 炎性因子、致痛因子的影响[J].深圳中西医结合杂 志,2020,30(6):113-114. [9]黄白云,陈锦雲,林晓君,等.整体护理联合全面护理在烧伤 整形植皮患者术后供皮区的应用及对其并发症率影响 分析[J].医学理论与实践,2022,35(5):858-859. [10]吕占武,王聪静.封闭式负压引流联合游离植皮术对 深度烧伤感染创面的效果研究[J].深圳中西医结合杂 志,2021,31(18):125-127. [11]刘希娟,陈洁,马英豪,等.康复护理干预促进深Ⅱ度下肢 烧伤患者植皮术后创面恢复与生活质量提升[J].陆军军 医大学学报,2023,45(8):854-860. [12]刘婷,丁晓倩,侯国冉.康复一体化护理在双下肢烧 伤植皮患者中的应用效果[J].中西医结合护理(中英 文),2023,9(3):33-36.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

崔莹. PDCA循环护理模式在行显微骨科游离植皮术患者中的应用效果[J].医学美学美容,2024,33(21):158-161.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:19
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-22