微种植体支抗辅助上颌磨牙整体远移矫治安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形伴轻中度拥挤的效果
作者:
作者简介:

邱明丽(1983.7-),女,陕西安康人,本科,主治医师,主要从事口腔正畸相关工作

中图分类号:

R783


Effect of Micro-implant Anchorage Assisted Maxillary Molar Distalization in the Treatment of Angle Class Ⅱ Malocclusion with Mild to Moderate Crowding
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究对安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形伴轻中度拥挤患者采用微种植体支抗辅助上颌磨牙整体远移矫治 的效果。方法 选取2020年1月-2021年12月汉滨明丽口腔诊所收治的86例安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形伴轻中度拥挤 患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,各43例。对照组实施上颌磨牙整体远移矫治,观察组实施微 种植体支抗辅助上颌磨牙整体远移矫治,比较两组矫治效果、不良反应发生情况及矫治依从性。结果 观 察组矫治总有效率为95.35%,高于对照组的76.74%(P <0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为4.65%,低于对 照组的23.26%(P <0.05);观察组矫治依从性为95.35%,高于对照组的70.09%(P <0.05)。结论 种植体 支抗辅助上颌磨牙整体远移矫治安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形伴轻中度拥挤的效果良好,能够抵抗磨牙远移过程中产 生的反作用力,实现磨牙的整体远移,并能够维持良好的咬合关系,有利于提高患者的矫治依从性减少不 良反应发生,值得临床应用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the effect of micro-implant anchorage assisted maxillary molar distalization in the treatment of Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion with mild to moderate crowding. Methods From January 2020 to December 2021, 86 patients with Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion and mild to moderate crowding admitted to Hanbin Mingli Stomatological Clinic were selected as the research objects, and they were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 43 patients in each group. The control group was treated with the whole distalization of maxillary molars, and the observation group was treated with microimplant anchorage to assist the whole distalization of maxillary molars. The treatment effect, adverse reactions and treatment compliance of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of correction in the observation group was 95.35%, which was higher than 76.74% in the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 4.65%, which was lower than 23.26% in the control group (P <0.05). The treatment compliance of the observation group was 95.35%, which was higher than 70.09% of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion The effect of micro-implant anchorage assisted maxillary molar distalization in the treatment of Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion with mild to moderate crowding is good, which can resist the reaction force generated in the process of molar distalization, realize the overall distalization of molars, and maintain a good occlusal relationship. Meanwhile, it is helpful to improve the treatment compliance and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, which is worthy of clinical application.

    参考文献
    [1]胡曙光,胡利兵,程媛媛.固定矫治联合微种植体支抗在 青少年安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形治疗中的应用[J].中国美容医 学,2024,33(3):135-139.
    [2]苏牧,赵慧,赵鑫.微种植支抗钉辅助固定矫治技术远 移磨牙治疗安氏Ⅱ类的临床研究[J].航空航天医学杂 志,2021,32(6):646-648.
    [3]谢琦,陈宇,史克佳.颧牙槽嵴区微种植体支抗矫治安氏 Ⅱ类错牙合畸形的疗效及美学效果分析[J].中国美容医 学,2023,32(10):127-130.
    [4]云彩庆.微螺钉种植体支抗在青年安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形的应 用效果观察[J].微创医学,2023,18(4):552-555.
    [5]李婧,樊永杰.不同垂直骨面型安氏Ⅱ类患者推上颌磨牙向 后对比研究[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2023,40(2):125- 127.
    [6]韩青,赵红宇,张彦喜.正畸微型种植体支抗治疗安氏 Ⅱ类错颌畸形患者的正畸效果[ J ] .四川生理科学杂 志,2023,45(4):633-637.
    [7]林泉宏,方月,于长英.微种植支抗钉结合滑动杆治疗 安氏Ⅱ类亚类错牙合畸形的疗效分析[ J ] .中国医疗美 容,2023,13(6):46-50.
    [8]吴洁,李文静,崔占琴,等.安氏Ⅱ类错牙合应用无托槽隐形 矫治远移上颌磨牙的研究进展[J].河北医科大学学 报,2022,43(8):973-977.
    [9]冯哲,田炳欣,马涛,等.对比微种植体支抗和改良横腭杆配 合PASS矫治器在儿童安氏Ⅰ~Ⅱ类错牙合高角拔牙矫治中 的应用[J].生物医学工程与临床,2022,26(4):459-464.
    [10]曹宇皎,谢红梅,张守用,等.微型种植体支抗与口外弓支 抗对错颌畸形患者牙周炎性微环境的影响分析[J].解放 军医药杂志,2019,31(9):82-86.
    [11]万茜,李群,唐镇.微型种植体正畸治疗安氏Ⅱ类错颌畸形 的疗效观察[J].江西医药,2021,56(10):1752-1754.
    [12]熊再道,周培刚,冯海霞,等.微种植体支抗整体远中移动 下牙列后牙根吸收变化的三维测量研究[J].中国实用口 腔科杂志,2021,14(5):575-579.
    [13]苗朝旭,王竞博,房博.正畸微型种植体对安氏Ⅱ类错颌畸 形患者牙周炎症及MMP-2、MMP-9的影响[J].海南医 学,2019,30(12):1578-1580.
    [14]徐晓静.全同步带状弓矫治技术对安氏Ⅱ类错牙合患者前 牙转矩控制情况的影响[J].临床医学,2020,40(11):68-70.
    [15]陈朝兴,陈建刚,文茜.微螺钉种植体支抗结合MBT直丝 弓矫治技术治疗安氏Ⅱ类上颌前突错牙合的有效性探究 [J].现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(12):2057-2059.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

邱明丽.微种植体支抗辅助上颌磨牙整体远移矫治安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形伴轻中度拥挤的效果[J].医学美学美容,2024,33(22):17-20.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:51
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-09