个性化正畸联合口腔美容修复对牙缺损伴牙畸形患者咬合功能的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国人民解放军总医院第三医学中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The Clinical Application Value of Orthodontic Treatment in Aesthetic Oral Surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨正畸治疗在口腔美容修复中的临床应用价值,为优化口腔美容修复方案提供依据。方法:选取2024年7月—2025年7月我院收治的120例需口腔美容修复患者,按随机数字表法分为观察组(60例)与对照组(60例)。对照组直接行常规口腔美容修复治疗,观察组先实施个性化正畸治疗后再行相同修复方案。比较两组治疗前后口腔美观评分(牙齿排列、咬合关系、牙龈健康、面部协调性)、咬合功能指标(咬合力、咀嚼效率)、修复体留存率及患者满意度,记录不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗后,观察组牙齿排列(9.12±0.68)分、咬合关系(9.25±0.57)分等各项美观评分均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组咬合力(586.32±45.17)N、咀嚼效率(89.26±5.34)%均优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组修复体1年留存率96.67%、满意度98.33%,均高于对照组的81.67%、78.33%(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:口腔美容修复前开展正畸治疗可显著提升美观效果与咬合功能,提高修复体稳定性及患者满意度,安全性可靠,具有重要临床价值。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To explore the clinical application value of orthodontic treatment in oral aesthetic restoration and provide evidence for optimizing aesthetic restoration protocols. Methods: A total of 120 patients requiring oral aesthetic restoration admitted to our hospital from July 2024 to July 2025 were randomly divided into an observation group (60 cases) and a control group (60 cases) using a random number table method. The control group received conventional oral aesthetic restoration therapy, while the observation group underwent personalized orthodontic treatment prior to the same restoration protocol. Comparative analysis was conducted on pre-and post-treatment aesthetic scores (tooth alignment, occlusal relationship, gingival health, facial harmony), occlusal function indicators (biting force, chewing efficiency), restoration retention rates, and patient satisfaction, with adverse reaction records. Results: Post-treatment aesthetic scores (tooth alignment: 9.12±0.68; occlusal relationship: 9.25±0.57) in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The observation group also demonstrated superior biting force (586.32±45.17 N) and chewing efficiency (89.26±5.34%) (P<0.05). The observation group achieved a 1-year restoration retention rate of 96.67% and satisfaction rate of 98.33%, both significantly higher than the control group"s 81.67% and 78.33% (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in adverse reaction rates between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Implementing orthodontic treatment before oral aesthetic restoration can significantly enhance aesthetic outcomes and occlusal function, improve restoration stability and patient satisfaction, demonstrating reliable safety and significant clinical value.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-12
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-09
  • 录用日期:2026-02-09
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码