Objective: To explore the effects of different oral restoration methods on aesthetic outcomes and restoration satisfaction in patients with anterior tooth defects.
Methods: A total of 86 patients with anterior tooth defects admitted between October 2022 and October 2024 were enrolled, all of whom were adults aged 20–30 years. Using a random number table method, the patients were divided into a control group and an observation group, with 43 cases in each group. The control group received all-ceramic crown restoration, while the observation group received porcelain veneer restoration. Aesthetic outcomes, restoration satisfaction, and the incidence of related complications after restoration were compared between the two groups.
Results: After restoration, scores for tooth color, morphology, and overall harmony in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P＜0.05). Restoration satisfaction in the observation group was also significantly higher than that in the control group (P＜0.05). No serious complications occurred in either group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05).
Conclusion: Compared with all-ceramic crown restoration, porcelain veneer restoration can achieve more ideal aesthetic outcomes and higher restoration satisfaction in patients with anterior tooth defects. It offers advantages such as minimal invasiveness and high safety, demonstrating high application value in young patients with anterior tooth defects and thus being worthy of clinical promotion.