负压封闭引流联合邻近皮瓣转位修复压力性损伤的有效性
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

山西盈康一生总医院烧伤整形科 山西运城 044000

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨负压封闭引流联合邻近皮瓣转位修复压力性损伤的临床疗效。方法 选取本院2023年1月2025年7月期间接诊的60例压力性损伤患者,以抽签法分成2组,各30例。对照组以负压封闭引流治疗,观察组以负压封闭引流联合邻近皮瓣转位状。比较两组的治疗疗效,创面面积、深度变化,创面愈合时间、创面皮肤颜色恢复时间、创面分泌物消失时间,疼痛程度与睡眠质量评分。结果 观察组治疗成功率高于对照组(p<0.05)。治疗前两组创面面积、创面深度比较结果(p>0.05);治疗后两组创面面积缩小、深度变浅,且观察组变化大于对照组(p<0.05)。观察组创面愈合时间、创面皮肤颜色恢复时间、创面分泌物消失时间均短于对照组(p<0.05)。治疗前两组数字模拟评分(NRS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量评分(PSQI)比较结果(p>0.05);治疗后两组NRS、PSQI评分下降,且观察组低于对照组(p<0.05)。结论 负压封闭引流联合邻近皮瓣移位修复压力性损伤的效果理想,能极大促进创面愈合,从而缩短创面愈合的时间,有助于减轻创面疼痛,改善患者的睡眠质量。

    Abstract:

    【】Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage combined with adjacent flap transposition in the repair of pressure injuries.Methods:A total of 60 patients with pressure injuries admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to July 2025 were selected and divided into two groups by drawing lots, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with vacuum sealing drainage alone, while the observation group was treated with vacuum sealing drainage combined with adjacent flap transposition. The therapeutic efficacy, changes in wound area and depth, wound healing time, wound skin color recovery time, wound secretion disappearance time, as well as pain degree and sleep quality scores were compared between the two groups.Results:The treatment success rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p<0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in wound area and depth between the two groups (p>0.05). After treatment, the wound area was reduced and the depth was shallower in both groups, and the improvements in the observation group were more significant than those in the control group (p<0.05). The wound healing time, wound skin color recovery time and wound secretion disappearance time of the observation group were all shorter than those of the control group (p<0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores between the two groups (p>0.05). After treatment, the NRS and PSQI scores of both groups decreased, and the scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (p<0.05).Conclusion:Vacuum sealing drainage combined with adjacent flap transposition has an ideal effect in repairing pressure injuries. It can greatly promote wound healing, thereby shortening the wound healing time, helping to relieve wound pain and improving the sleep quality of patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-06
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-27
  • 录用日期:2026-02-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码