环泊酚与丙泊酚在面部整形手术麻醉中的应用及对注射痛发生率及舒适度的影响比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张慧(1994.5-),女,江苏盐城人,硕士,住院医师,主要从事临床麻醉、围术期重要脏器功能保护方面工作

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R614.2

基金项目:


Comparison of Ciprofol and Propofol in Anesthesia for Facial Plastic Surgery and its Inffuence on Injection Pain Rate and Comfort
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较在面部整形手术麻醉中应用环泊酚与丙泊酚的效果及对患者注射痛发生率及舒适度的影响。方法 纳入2023年3月-2026年3月于江苏省中医院就诊的86例面部整形手术患者,以随机数字表法分为A组、B组,各43例。A组予以丙泊酚麻醉,B组予以环泊酚麻醉,比较两组血流动力学参数、麻醉起效时间、麻醉恢复室停留时间、注射痛发生率、舒适度及不良反应发生率。结果 两组T0时MAP、HR比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组T1、T2、T3时MAP、HR均较A组低(P<0.05);B组麻醉起效时间、麻醉恢复室停留时间均较A组短(P<0.05);B组注射痛发生率为2.33%,较A组的18.60%低(P<0.05);B组术后12 h BCS评分较A组低(P<0.05);B组不良反应发生率(4.65%)较A组(23.26%)低(P<0.05)。结论 相比于丙泊酚,在面部整形手术麻醉中应用环泊酚的效果更佳,能够更有效地维持血流动力学稳定,缩短麻醉起效及恢复时间,降低注射痛等不良反应发生几率,有利于提高患者舒适度。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the effect of ciprofol and propofol in anesthesia for facial plastic surgery and its inffuence on injection pain rate and comfort. Methods A total of 86 patients who underwent facial plastic surgery in Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM from March 2023 to March 2026 were selected, and they were divided into group A and group B by the random number table method, with 43 patients in each group. Group A was given propofol anesthesia, and group B was given ciprofol anesthesia. The hemodynamic parameters, anesthesia onset time, post-anesthesia care unit stay time, injection pain rate, comfort and adverse reaction rate were compared between the two groups. Results There were no signiffcant differences in MAP and HR at T0 between the two groups (P>0.05). The MAP and HR in group B at T1, T2 and T3 were lower than those in group A (P<0.05). The anesthesia onset time and post-anesthesia care unit stay time in group B were shorter than those in group A (P<0.05). The incidence of injection pain in group B was 2.33%, which was lower than 18.60% in group A (P<0.05). The BCS score in group B at 12 hours after operation was lower than that in group A (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group B (4.65%) was lower than that in group A (23.26%) (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with propofol, ciprofol has better efficacy in anesthesia for facial plastic surgery, which can more effectively maintain hemodynamic stability, shorten anesthesia onset and recovery time, reduce the incidence of injection pain and other adverse reactions, and improve patient comfort.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张 慧,杨海基.环泊酚与丙泊酚在面部整形手术麻醉中的应用及对注射痛发生率及舒适度的影响比较[J].医学美学美容,2026,35(9):80-83.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码