不同浓度5-氟尿嘧啶联合复方倍他米松治疗胸前区病理性瘢痕的有效性与安全性
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李路(1983.7-),男,贵州遵义人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事皮肤外科方向研究

通讯作者:

彭亮(1979.1-),男,贵州遵义人,博士,副主任医师,主要从事急诊创伤修复方向研究

中图分类号:

R622

基金项目:


Efffcacy and Safety of Different Concentrations of 5-Fluorouracil Combined with Compound Betamethasone in the Treatment of Pathological Chest Scar
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨不同浓度5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)联合复方倍他米松治疗胸前区病理性瘢痕的有效性与安全性。方法 选取贵州航天医院2023年9月-2024年9月收治的80例胸前区病理性瘢痕(增生性瘢痕、瘢痕疙瘩)患者,根据随机数字表法分为低浓度组、中等浓度组、中高浓度组、高浓度组,每组20例。分别接受配置浓度为6.3 mg/ml(低浓度组)、12.6 mg/ml(中等浓度组)、25.2 mg/ml(中高浓度组)、50 mg/ml(高浓度组)的5-FU及复方倍他米松混悬液注射,比较四组临床疗效、温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)评分及不良反应发生率。结果 四组注射后1年总有效率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高浓度组总有效率高于低浓度组和中等浓度组(P<0.05);高浓度组和中高浓度组总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);四组注射后1年VSS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高浓度组注射后1年VSS评分低于低浓度组和中等浓度组(P<0.05);高浓度组与中高浓度组注射后1年VSS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);四组痤疮、毛囊炎、骨质疏松发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);四组造血系统抑制发生率及不良反应发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 中高浓度与高浓度5-FU联合复方倍他米松治疗胸前区病理性瘢痕具有良好的临床效果,能够有效改善瘢痕症状,但高浓度组在造血系统抑制发生率及不良反应发生率方面较高,未增加其他不良反应的发生几率。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of different concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with compound betamethasone in the treatment of pathological chest scar. Methods A total of 80 patients with pathological chest scar (hypertrophic scar and keloid) admitted to Guizhou Aerospace Hospital from September 2023 to September 2024 were selected, and they were divided into the low-concentration group, the medium-concentration group, the medium-high-concentration group and the high-concentration group by the random number table method, with 20 patients in each group. The four groups were injected with 5-FU and compound betamethasone suspension at concentrations of 6.3 mg/ml, 12.6 mg/ml, 25.2 mg/ml and 50 mg/ml respectively. The clinical efffcacy, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score and adverse reaction rate were compared among the four groups. Results There were signiffcant differences in the total effective rate among the four groups at 1 year after injection (P<0.05). The total effective rate of the high-concentration group was higher than that of the low-concentration group and the medium-concentration group (P<0.05). There was no signiffcant difference in the total effective rate between the high-concentration group and the medium-high-concentration group (P>0.05). There were signiffcant differences in VSS scores among the four groups at 1 year after injection (P<0.05). The VSS score of the high-concentration group at 1 year after injection was lower than that of the low-concentration group and the medium-concentration group (P<0.05). There was no signiffcant difference in VSS scores between the high-concentration group and the medium-high-concentration group at 1 year after injection (P>0.05). There were no signiffcant differences in the incidence of acne, folliculitis and adverse reactions among the four groups (P>0.05). There were signiffcant differences in the incidence of hematopoietic system inhibition and adverse reactions among the four groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Medium-high concentration and high concentration of 5-FU combined with compound betamethasone achieve good clinical efficacy in the treatment of pathological chest scar and can effectively improve scar symptoms. However, the high-concentration group has a higher incidence of hematopoietic system inhibition and adverse reactions, without increasing the risk of other adverse reactions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李 路,杨进庆,石文贵,等.不同浓度5-氟尿嘧啶联合复方倍他米松治疗胸前区病理性瘢痕的有效性与安全性[J].医学美学美容,2026,35(9):115-118.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码