PRF联合骨增量技术对美学区种植患者软组织厚度及美学效果的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

袁志鹏(1992.1-),男,江西南昌人,本科,主治医师,主要从事口腔种植方面工作

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R783

基金项目:


Effect of PRF Combined with Bone Augmentation Technique on Soft Tissue Thickness and Aesthetic Effect in Patients Undergoing Aesthetic Zone Implantation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨美学区种植患者应用富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)联合骨增量技术对其软组织厚度及美学效果的影响。方法 选取2024年7月-2025年12月广州曙光美云口腔医院口腔科收治的100例美学区种植患者,按照随机数字表法分对照组(n=50)与观察组(n=50)。对照组用单纯骨增量技术,观察组用PRF联合骨增量技术,比较两组软组织厚度相关指标、骨组织相关指标、美学修复效果及并发症发生率。结果 观察组术后3、4个月牙龈厚度、角化龈宽度均高于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后4个月种植体周围骨水平、骨密度均高于术前,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后4个月PES、WES评分均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率(4.00%)低于对照组(16.00%)(P<0.05)。结论 PRF联合骨增量技术用于美学区种植,可增加软组织厚度,改善骨条件,提升美学效果,降低并发症发生几率。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effect of platelet-rich ffbrin (PRF) combined with bone augmentation technique on soft tissue thickness and aesthetic effect in patients undergoing aesthetic zone implantation. Methods A total of 100 patients who underwent aesthetic zone implantation in the Department of Stomatology, Guangzhou Sogood Meiyun Stomatological Hospital from July 2024 to December 2025 were selected, and they were divided into the control group and the observation group by the random number table method, with 50 patients in each group. The control group was treated with bone augmentation technique alone, and the observation group was treated with PRF combined with bone augmentation technique. The soft tissue thickness-related indicators, bone tissue-related indicators, aesthetic restoration effect and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The gingival thickness and keratinized gingival width of the observation group at 3 and 4 months after surgery were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). At 4 months after surgery, the marginal bone level and bone density around implants in the two groups were higher than those before surgery, and those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). At 4 months after surgery, the scores of PES and WES in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group (4.00%) was lower than that in the control group (16.00%) (P<0.05). Conclusion For aesthetic zone implantation, PRF combined with bone augmentation technique can increase soft tissue thickness, optimize bone conditions, improve aesthetic restoration effect, and reduce the incidence of complications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

袁志鹏. PRF联合骨增量技术对美学区种植患者软组织厚度及美学效果的影响[J].医学美学美容,2026,35(11):80-83.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码